data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb43d/eb43da9c0442496236a965608ce66f44d7a9b44a" alt=""
What's probably at play here is the big chains' insistence on maintaining product uniformity. McDonald's famously revolutionized Russia's agricultural system when it set up shop in the country in the early 1990s. The chain imported the special potato seeds it needed from the Netherlands in order to get the fries to taste just right.
It's pretty clear that burger chains can exist in Iceland, but the country's difficult climate and terrain probably make it impossible to locally grow the sort of ingredients the chains need in order to make the food taste just like it does in the U.S. of A. In the end, it looks like they'd rather pull out than make food with locally produced ingredients that tastes different from what people are accustomed to.
Interestingly, Subway's fortunes in Iceland would seem to lend credence to this theory. The chain, which is set to soon eclipse McDonald's as the largest purveyor of fast-food in the world - at least by total restaurant numbers - has 18 outlets in the country. Subway, with its generally fresher ingredients, is far less dependent on the sort of technologically produced and preserved goods made by McDonald's and Burger King.
By the way, songstress Bjork has nothing to do with this story. But, as with using a picture of the Sydney Opera House to illustrate any story about Australia, her inclusion in any post or article about Iceland is also a semi-official media rule.
0 comments:
Post a Comment